##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

Numerical solutions are never exact due to errors emanating from the scheme used in discretizing the governing equations and the flow domain. For convection-diffusion flow, the magnitude of these errors varies depending on the scheme used to interpolate the nodal values of the flow quantities to the interfaces. An interpolation scheme that minimizes these errors would give results that are consistent to experimental results. This paper documents the performance of three linear interpolation schemes; upwind differencing, central differencing scheme and the hybrid scheme in obtaining temperature profiles for a convection-diffusion turbulent flow field. To eliminate the enormous scales inherent in turbulent flow, the field variables present in the governing equations are decomposed into a mean and a fluctuating component and averaged. The closure problem was solved using the  turbulence model. The resulting equations are discretized using the robust finite volume discretization technique. The discretized equations are solved using a segregated pressure-based algorithm. The results revealed that the central difference interpolation scheme generate temperature profiles that were consistent with experimental results of Ampofo and Karayiannis, (2003).

References

  1. Awuor KO. simulating Natural Turbulent Convection Fluid Flow in an Enclosure the Two-Equation Turbulent Models Ph.D. Thesis. UNIVERSITY NAME; 2013.
     Google Scholar
  2. Kane, M., Cheikh, M., Lamine, S and Joseph, S. “ Natural Convection of Air in a Square Cavity with Partially Thermally Active Side Walls”. Open Journal of Fluid Dynamics, vol. 7, no.4
     Google Scholar
  3. Noor-A-Alam S. (2015). “Free Convection Heat Transfer in a Square Cavity heated from below and symmetrically cooling from the sides.” International Journal of innovative Science Engineering and Technology, 2015; 2(8); 2348-79
     Google Scholar
  4. Wilcox DC. Turbulence modeling for CFD. La Canada, CA: DCW industries, 1998.
     Google Scholar
  5. Menter FR. Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications. AIAA Journal. 1994; 32(8): 1598-1605.
     Google Scholar
  6. Versteeg HK, Malalasekera W. (2007). An introduction to computational fluid dynamics: the finite volume method. Pearson Education, 2007.
     Google Scholar
  7. Abdelkalder B, Karim R, Youb K. Numerical Study of Mixed Convection Heat Transfer in a Lid-Driven Cavity Filled with a nano fluid. Mechanics and Industry. 2015; 16: 505.
     Google Scholar
  8. Ampofo F, Karayiannis TG. Experimental benchmark data for turbulent natural convection in an air filled square cavity. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer. 2003; 46(19): 3551-3572.
     Google Scholar
  9. Anderson JD, Wendt J. Computational fluid dynamics. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1995.
     Google Scholar
  10. Dalal A, Das MK. Natural convection in a rectangular cavity heated from below and uniformly cooled from the top and both sides. Numerical Heat Transfer, Part A: Applications. 2006; 49(3): 301-322.
     Google Scholar
  11. de Vahl Davis G. Finite difference methods for natural and mixed convection in enclosures. International Heat Transfer Conference Digital Library. Begel House Inc, 1986.
     Google Scholar
  12. Edward M, Sigey J, Okello J, Okwoyo J. Natural Convection with Localized Heating and Cooling on Opposite Vertical Walls in an Enclosure. CNCE 1. 2013; 4: 72-78.
     Google Scholar
  13. Ferziger JH, Perić M, Street RL. Computational methods for fluid dynamics. Berlin: Springer, 2002.
     Google Scholar
  14. Gikundi A, Awuor K, Karanja S. A numerical study of Turbulen Natural Convection in a rectangular enclosure heated from below. German Journal of Advanced Scientific Research. 2020; 3(4).
     Google Scholar
  15. Jones WP, Launder BE. The prediction of laminarization with a two-equation model of turbulence. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer. 1972; 15(2): 301-314.
     Google Scholar
  16. Karanja S, Sigey J, Gatheri F, Kirima, E. Turbulent Natural Convection in an Enclosure at Varying Aspect Ratio.
     Google Scholar
  17. Layton WR. The 1877 Boussinesq Conjecture: Turbulent Fluctuations Are Dissipative on the Mean Flow, 2014.
     Google Scholar
  18. Onyango O, Sigey J, Okelo AJ, Okwoyo J. (2013). Enhancement of natural convection heat transfer in a square enclosure with localized heating from below. International Journal of Science and Research. 2013; 2(10): 82-87.
     Google Scholar
  19. Oosthuizen P, Paul J. (2010). The effect of end conditions on laminar and turbulent natural convective flow in a high aspect ratio enclosure. 10th AIAA/ASME Joint Thermophysics and Heat Transfer Conference. 2010: 5066.
     Google Scholar
  20. Patankar SV. Numerical heat transfer and fluid flow. Washington, DC, Hemisphere Publishing Corp., 1980.
     Google Scholar
  21. Rodi W. Turbulence models and their application in hydraulics. CRC Press, 1993.
     Google Scholar
  22. Safaei M, Mohammadi M. (2011). Numerical modeling of turbulence mixed convection heat transfer in air filled enclosures by finite volume method. The International Journal of Multiphysics. 2011; 5(4): 307-324.
     Google Scholar
  23. Salih EA. Effects of aspect ratio on natural convection heat transfer in a parallelogrammic enclosure heated from below. ZANCO Journal of Pure and Applied Sciences. 2015; 27(4): 45-56.
     Google Scholar
  24. Sarris IE, Lekakis I, Vlachos NS. Natural convection in rectangular tanks heated locally from below. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer. 2004; 47(14-16): 3549-3563.
     Google Scholar
  25. Sharif ML, Mohammed LA. (2005). Unsteady free convection and mass transfer in rectangular cavities using the Finite Volume based computational method. Thermal International Journal. 2005; 10: 568-789.
     Google Scholar
  26. Tryggvason G. Chapter 6-Computational Fluid Dynamics. PK Kundu, IM Cohen, and DRBT-FM (Sixth E . Dowling, Eds. Boston, 227-291.
     Google Scholar