Bifurcation Analysis of an SIR Epidemic Model through Differential Equation Approach



Abstract Views
257

Downloads
208

Citations

Share

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Submitted Apr 4, 2023
Published Jul 6, 2023
10.24018/ejmath.2023.4.4.239

Abstract viewed = 257 times

Table of Contents

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

The well-known SIR models have been around for many years. Under some suitable assumptions, the models provide information about when the epidemic occurs and when it doesn’t. The models can be restructured by incorporating birth & death rate, portion of population vaccinated, carrying capacity of population, saturation rate, growth rate, time delay and immunization to analyze the outcome mathematically. In this regard several SIR models including birth, death and immunization as well as bifurcation analysis associated with disease free and epidemic equilibrium have been studied. Findings of this research are with some suitable assumptions how these incorporated parameters as well as bifurcation analysis can play an important role in determining epidemic status in the society in more reliable and convenient way.
Keywords: SIR Models epidemic carryinh capacity immunization Equilibrium bifurcation

References

  1. Kermack W, McKendrick A. A short history of mathematical population dynamics. Springer-verlag London limited; 2011
     Google Scholar
  2. Fraser C, Donnelly CA. Pandemic potential of a strain of influenza A (H1N1). Early findings. Science. 2009; 324(2):1557-1561.
     Google Scholar
  3. Banerjee SK, Andrews B. Mathematical Analysis of Regression model Epidemiology. American Academic Scientific Research Journal for Engineering, Technology, and Sciences. 2023; 93(1): 39-49.
     Google Scholar
  4. Stephen BH and Steven RC. Designing Clinical Research. Williams and Wilkins. 2017; 7(1): 131-145.
     Google Scholar
  5. Herbert H, Dimitri B. Mathematics of Epidemiological Stabilities. SIAM Review. 2017; 8(2): 217-235.
     Google Scholar
  6. Brooks-Pollock E, Ken TDE. Pigs didn’t fly, but swine flu. Mathematics Today. 2011; 47(1): 36-40.
     Google Scholar
  7. Stone L, Shulgin B, Agur Z. Analysis of an SIR epidemic model with pulse vaccination and distributed time delay. Journal of Biomedicine and Biotechnology. 2007; 28(1): 239-254.
     Google Scholar
  8. Sharon K, Leo K, Thomas M. Applied Regression Analysis and Multivariate Methods. London: Cole Publishing; 2018.
     Google Scholar
  9. Kenneth JR, Sander G. Modern Epidemiology. PA: Lippincott-Raven Publishing; 2018.
     Google Scholar
  10. Andrea M and Peter H. Nonlinear seasonally forced epidemiological models. Journal of Mathematical Biology. 2016; 52(2): 833-862.
     Google Scholar
  11. Nicolas B, Herbert H, Dimitri B. Wavering in seasonally forced epidemiological models. Journal of Mathematical Biology. 2018; 89(2):118-148.
     Google Scholar
  12. Elyas H, Dimitri B. An SIR epidemic model with inconsistent latency infectious period. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering. 2017; 3(1): 654-676.
     Google Scholar
  13. Herbert H, Lawrence DW. Mathematics of inconsistent incidence rate of infectious diseases. SIAM review. 2017; 10(1): 233-287.
     Google Scholar
  14. Carlos R, Andrea M, Nicolas B. Persistence in seasonally forced epidemiological models. Journal of Mathematical Biology.2012; 64(3): 933-949.
     Google Scholar
  15. Elizabeth B, Dimitri B. An SEIR epidemic model with constant latency time and infectious period. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering. 2018; 8(1): 931-952.
     Google Scholar