##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

Picture fuzzy relation is an important and powerful concept which is suitable for describing correspondences between objects. It represents the strength of association of the elements of picture fuzzy sets. In this paper we have defined min-max composition for picture fuzzy relations and some properties are explored based on this definition. Also we have discussed some properties of max-min composition for picture fuzzy relations. Finally, an application is discussed as illustration to show how the picture fuzzy relation are applied in decision making.

References

  1. Zadeh LA. Fuzzy sets. Information and Control. 1965; 8: 338-353.
     Google Scholar
  2. Atanassov KT. Intuitionistic fuzzy set. Fuzzy Sets and Systems. 1986; 20: 87-97.
     Google Scholar
  3. Cuong BC. Picture fuzzy sets. J. Comput. Sci. Cybern. 2014; 30: 409-420.
     Google Scholar
  4. Zadeh LA. Similarity relations and fuzzy orderings. Information Sciences. 1971; 3:177-200.
     Google Scholar
  5. Kaufmann A. Introduction to the Theory of Fuzzy Subsets-vol-1: Fundamental Theoretical Elements. New York: Academic Press; 1980.
     Google Scholar
  6. Klir G, Yaun B. Fuzzy Set and Fuzzy logic: Theory and Application. Upper Saddle River NJ: Prentice Hall; 1977.
     Google Scholar
  7. Zimmerman HJ. Fuzzy Set Theory and Its Application. Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1996.
     Google Scholar
  8. Blin JM. Fuzzy Relations in Group Decision Theory. J. Cybern. 1974; 4: 17-22.
     Google Scholar
  9. Cock MD, Kerre EE. On (un) suitable fuzzy relations to model approximate equality. Fuzzy Sets. Syst. 2003; 133: 137-153.
     Google Scholar
  10. Yang MS, Shih HM. Cluster analysis based on fuzzy relations. Fuzzy Sets. Syst. 2001; 120: 197-212.
     Google Scholar
  11. Tamura S, Higuchi S, Tanaka K. Pattern Classification Based on Fuzzy Relations. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern.1971;1: 61-66.
     Google Scholar
  12. Qi F, Yang SW, Feng X. Research on the Comprehensive Evaluation of Sports Management System with Interval-Valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy Information. Bull. Sci. Technol. 2013; 2.
     Google Scholar
  13. Yang HL, Li SG. Restudy of intuitionistic fuzzy relations. Syst. Eng. Theory Pract. 2009; 29: 114-120.
     Google Scholar
  14. Jin JL, Wei YM, Ding J. Fuzzy comprehensive evaluation model based on improved analytic hierarchy process. J. Hydraul. Eng. 2004; 3: 65-70.
     Google Scholar
  15. Bustinee H. Construction of intuitionistic fuzzy relations with predetermined properties. Fuzzy Sets. Syst. 2000; 109: 379-403.
     Google Scholar
  16. Burillo P, Bustince H. Intuitionistic fuzzy relations (Part I). Mathw. Soft Comput. 1995; 2: 5-38.
     Google Scholar
  17. Lei YJ, Wang BS, Miao QG. On the intuitionistic fuzzy relations with compositional operations. Syst. Eng.Theory Pract. 2005; 25: 30-34.
     Google Scholar
  18. Cuong BC. Picture Fuzzy Sets-First Results, Part 1, Seminar “Neuro-Fuzzy Systems with Applications”. Preprint 03/2013. Institute of Mathematics: Hanoi, Vietnam. 2013.
     Google Scholar
  19. Cuong BC, Hai PV. Some fuzzy logic operators for picture fuzzy sets. Seventh International Conference on Knowledge and Systems Engineering. 2015: 132-137.
     Google Scholar
  20. Cuong BC, Ngan RT, Hai BD. An involutive picture fuzzy negator on picture fuzzy sets and some De Morgan triples. Seventh International Conference on Knowledge and Systems Engineering. 2015: 126-131.
     Google Scholar
  21. Cuong BC, Kreinovich V, Ngan RT. A classification of representable t-norm operators for picture fuzzy sets. Departmental Technical Reports (CS), Paper 1047. 2016.
     Google Scholar
  22. Dutta P, Saikia K. Some aspects of Equivalence Picture Fuzzy Relation. AMSE JOURNAL- AMSE IIETA.2018; 54: 424-434.
     Google Scholar