##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

Modelling and forecasting the volatility of a financial time series has become essential in many economic and financial applications like portfolio optimization and risk management. The symmetric-GARCH type models can capture volatility and leptokurtosis. However, the models fail to capture leverage effects, volatility clustering, and the thick tail property of high-frequency financial time series. The main objective of this study was to apply the asymmetric-GARCH type models to Kenyan exchange to overcome the shortcomings of symmetric-GARCH type models. The study compared the asymmetric Conditional Heteroskedasticity class of models: EGARCH, TGARCH, APARCH, GJR-GARCH, and IGARCH. Secondary data on the exchange rate from January 1993 to June 2021 were obtained from the Central Bank of Kenya website. The best fit model is determined based on parsimony of the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC), Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC), Log-Likelihood criterion, and minimisation of prediction production errors (Mean error [ME] and Root Mean Absolute error [RMAE]). The optimal variance equation for the exchange rates data was APARCH (1,1) - ARMA (3,0) model with a skewed normal distribution (AIC = -4.6871, BIC = -4.5860). Volatility clustering was present in exchange rate data with evidence of the leverage effect. Estimated Kenya’s exchange rate volatility narrows over time, indicating sustained exchange rate stability.

References

  1. Alexander C. Market models. A Guide to Financial Data Analysis. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.; 2001.
     Google Scholar
  2. Coondoo D, Mukherjee P. Components of volatility and their empirical measures: a note. Applied Financial Economics. 2004 Dec 1;14(18):1313-8. doi: 10.1080/09603100412331313550.
     Google Scholar
  3. Andersen TG, Bollerslev T, Christoffersen PF, Diebold FX. Volatility and correlation forecasting. Handbook of economic forecasting. 2006 Jan 1;1:777-878. doi: 10.1016/S1574-0706(05)01015-3.
     Google Scholar
  4. Tsay RS. Analysis of financial time series. John wiley & sons; 2005 Sep 15.
     Google Scholar
  5. Sewell M. Characterization of financial time series. Rn. University College London; 2011 Jan 20;11(01):01. Available from: http://www.cs.ucl.ac.uk/fileadmin/UCL-CS/images/Research_Student_Information/RN_11_01.pdf [Accessed 7th October 2021].
     Google Scholar
  6. Akpan EA, Moffat IU, Ekpo NB. Arma-arch modeling of the returns of first bank of Nigeria. Eur. Sci. J. 2016 Jun 1;12:257-66. doi: 10.19044/esj.2016.v12n18p257.
     Google Scholar
  7. Cont R. Volatility clustering in financial markets: empirical facts and agent-based models. Long memory in economics. Berlin: Springer, 2007:289-309. doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-34625-8_10.
     Google Scholar
  8. Engle RF, Ng VK. Measuring and testing the impact of news on volatility. The journal of finance. 1993 Dec;48(5):1749-78. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1993.tb05127.x.
     Google Scholar
  9. Zakoian JM, Francq C. GARCH models: structure, istatistical inference and financial application. 2010.
     Google Scholar
  10. Cryer JD, Chan KS. Time Series Models Of Heteroscedasticity. Time Series Analysis: With Applications in R. New York: Springer 2008:277-318. doi: 10.1007/978-0-387-75959-3_12.
     Google Scholar
  11. Engle RF, Bollerslev T. Modelling the persistence of conditional variances. Econometric reviews. 1986 Jan 1;5(1):1-50. doi: 10.1080/07474938608800095.
     Google Scholar
  12. Nelson DB. Conditional heteroskedasticity in asset returns: A new approach. Econometrica: Journal of the econometric society. 1991 Mar 1:347-70. doi: 10.2307/2938260.
     Google Scholar
  13. Glosten LR, Jagannathan R, Runkle DE. On the relation between the expected value and the volatility of the nominal excess return on stocks. The journal of finance. 1993 Dec;48(5):1779-801. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1993.tb05128.x.
     Google Scholar
  14. Moffat IU, Akpan EA, Abasiekwere UA. A time series evaluation of the asymmetric nature of heteroscedasticity: an EGARCH approach. International Journal of Statistics and Applied Mathematics. 2017;2(6):111-7. Available from: https://www.mathsjournal.com/pdf/2017/vol2issue6/PartB/2-5-10-577.pdf [Accessed 15th October 2021].
     Google Scholar
  15. Olweny T, Omondi K. The effect of macro-economic factors on stock return volatility in the Nairobi stock exchange, Kenya. Economics and Finance review. 2011 Dec;1(10):34-48. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Tobias-Olweny/publication/228451409_THE_EFFECT_OF_MACRO-ECONOMIC_FACTORS_ON_STOCK_RETURN_VOLATILITY_IN_THE_NAIROBI_STOCK_EXCHANGE_KENYA/links/0deec53b1c5d3cfb8b000000/THE-EFFECT-OF-MACRO-ECONOMIC-FACTORS-ON-STOCK-RETURN-VOLATILITY-IN-THE-NAIROBI-STOCK-EXCHANGE-KENYA.pdf [Accessed 15th October 2021].
     Google Scholar
  16. Hafner CM, Linton O. An almost closed form estimator for the EGARCH model. Econometric Theory. 2017 Aug;33(4):1013-38. doi:10.1017/S0266466616000256.
     Google Scholar
  17. Wagala A, Nassiuma DK, Islam AS, Mwangi JW. Volatility modeling of the Nairobi Securities Exchange weekly returns using the ARCH-type models. International Journal of Applied Science and Technology. 2012;2(3):165-74.
     Google Scholar
  18. PETRICĂ AC, Stancu S. Empirical Results of Modeling EUR/RON Exchange Rate using ARCH, GARCH, EGARCH, TARCH and PARCH models. Romanian Statistical Review. 2017 Jan 1(1). https://www.revistadestatistica.ro/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/A4_RRS1_2017.pdf.
     Google Scholar
  19. Kandora A, Abbas H, Hamdi AM. Modelling Exchange Rate Volatility Using Asymmetric GARCH Models (Case Study Sudan). Journal of Mathematics. 2016;12(2):71-7.
     Google Scholar
  20. Central Bank of Kenya (CBK) website. Available from: https://www.centralbank.go.ke/rates/forex-exchange-rates/ [Accessed 23rd November 2021].
     Google Scholar
  21. R Core Team R. A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2020. Vienna, Austria. URL https://www.R-project.org/.
     Google Scholar
  22. Ghalanos, A. Introduction to the rugarch package. (Version 1.4-3). 2022 Feb 2. Available from: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/rugarch/vignettes/Introduction_to_the_rugarch_package.pdf [Accessed February 19, 2022].
     Google Scholar
  23. Engle RF. Autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity with estimates of the variance of United Kingdom inflation. Econometrica: Journal of the econometric society. 1982 Jul 1:987-1007. doi: 10.2307/1912773.
     Google Scholar
  24. Bollerslev T. Generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity. Journal of econometrics. 1986 Apr 1;31(3):307-27. doi: 10.1016/0304-4076(86)90063-1.
     Google Scholar
  25. Poon SH. A practical guide to forecasting financial market volatility. John Wiley & Sons; 2005 Aug 19.
     Google Scholar
  26. Shephard, N. Statistical aspects of ARCH and stochastic volatility. In: Cox, D.R., Hinkley, D.V., Barndorff-Nielson, O.E. (Eds.), Time Series Models in Econometrics, Finance and Other Fields. Chapman & Hall, London. 1996: 1–67.
     Google Scholar
  27. Zhang H, Rudholm N. Modeling and forecasting regional GDP in Sweden using autoregressive models. M.S. Thesis, Dalama University; 2013.
     Google Scholar
  28. Clements MP. Evaluating econometric forecasts of economic and financial variables. Springer. New York: Palgrave Macmillan; 2005 Jan 21. doi: 10.1057/9780230596146.
     Google Scholar
  29. Poon SH, Granger CW. Forecasting volatility in financial markets: A review. Journal of economic literature. 2003 Jun 1;41(2):478-539.
     Google Scholar
  30. Dickey DA, Fuller WA. Distribution of the estimators for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Journal of the American statistical association. 1979 Jun 1;74(366a):427-31. doi: 10.1080/01621459.1979.10482531.
     Google Scholar
  31. Westfall PH. Kurtosis as peakedness, 1905–2014. RIP. The American Statistician. 2014 Jul 3;68(3):191-5. doi: 10.1080/00031305.2014.917055.
     Google Scholar
  32. Ghalanos A, Ghalanos MA, Rcpp L. Package ‘rugarch’. R Team Cooperation. 2018 Jan 28:43. Available from: https://cran.utstat.utoronto.ca/web/packages/rugarch/rugarch.pdf [Accessed February 19, 2022].
     Google Scholar
  33. Andersen TG, Bollerslev T. Heterogeneous information arrivals and return volatility dynamics: Uncovering the long‐run in high frequency returns. The journal of Finance. 1997 Jul;52(3):975-1005. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1997.tb02722.x.
     Google Scholar
  34. Ding Z, Granger CW, Engle RF. A long memory property of stock market returns and a new model. Journal of empirical finance. 1993 Jun 1;1(1):83-106. doi:10.1016/0927-5398(93)90006-D.
     Google Scholar
  35. Taylor S. Modeling financial time series. John Wiley & Sons. Great Britain. 1986.
     Google Scholar
  36. Onwukwe CE, Bassey BE, Isaac IO. On modeling the volatility of Nigerian stock returns using GARCH models. Journal of mathematics research. 2011 Nov 1;3(4):31. doi: 10.5539/jmr.v3n4p31.
     Google Scholar
  37. Benedict, M. B. Modelling Rates of Inflation In Ghana: An Application Of Autoregressive Conditional Heteroscedastic (Arch) Type Models. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Ghana); 2013.
     Google Scholar
  38. Nwoye HC. Determination of Volatility Clustering in Garch Family Models Using R. Ph.D. Thesis; 2017.
     Google Scholar
  39. Pahlavani M, Roshan R. The comparison among ARIMA and hybrid ARIMA-GARCH models in forecasting the exchange rate of Iran. International Journal of Business and Development Studies. 2015 Dec 1;7(1):31-50.
     Google Scholar
  40. Thorlie MA, Song L, Wang X, Amin M. Modelling exchange rate volatility using asymmetric GARCH models (evidence from Sierra Leone). International Journal of Science and Research. 2014;3(11):1206-14.
     Google Scholar
  41. Omari CO, Mwita PN, Waititu AG. Modeling USD/KES exchange rate volatility using GARCH models. 2017. Available from: http://ir.mksu.ac.ke/handle/123456780/1790 [Accessed March 7, 2022].
     Google Scholar